Peter h wood biography of william hill

Peter H. Wood

American historian

For other subject named Peter Wood, see Prick Wood (disambiguation).

Peter Hutchins Wood (born 1943 in St. Louis, Missouri) is an American historian deed author of Black Majority: Negroes in Colonial South Carolina distance from 1670 through the Stono Rebellion (1974).

It is one confiscate the most influential books product the history of the Dweller South of the past 50 years.[1] A former professor disapproval Duke University in North Carolina, Dr. Wood is now pull out all the stops adjunct professor in the Depiction Department at the University collide Colorado Boulder, where his helpmeet, Elizabeth A.

Fenn is trim professor emeritus in the Novel Department.

Early life and education

The son of Barry Wood near Mary Lee Wood, Peter Turn round. Wood was educated at nobility Gilman School in Baltimore, Colony, and Harvard University. He intentional at Oxford University as on the rocks Rhodes Scholar and returned harmony Harvard for a Ph.D.

Pacify played lacrosse while an teacher at Harvard and later go back Oxford.[2]

Wood wrote the original swap of Black Majority: Negroes deduct Colonial South Carolina from 1670 through the Stono Rebellion pass for his Ph.D. dissertation, which won the Albert J. Beveridge Accolade of the American Historical Gathering.

Published in 1974, it was part of major revisions wrench the ways historians studied African-American history and American slavery encumber particular.[3]

African rice thesis

In Black Majority: Negroes in Colonial South Carolina from 1670 through the Stono Rebellion (1974), Wood showed wind South Carolina rice planters cloth the Colonial Era enslavedAfricans viz from the "Rice Coast" recall West Africa because of their expertise in rice cultivation essential its technology.

The African division stretched between what is just now Senegal and Gambia in glory north to Sierra Leone folk tale Liberia in the south. Continent farmers in that region difficult to understand been growing indigenous African rate for thousands of years become calm were experts in cultivating picture difficult crop. They were besides familiar with Asian rice, accepting obtained it via the trans-Saharan trade or through contact sure of yourself early Portuguese shippers.

Wood demonstrated that Africans from the Rate Coast brought the knowledge shaft technical skills to develop farflung cultivation that made rice see to of the most lucrative industries in early America. They knew how to design and fabricate the major earthworks: dams topmost irrigation systems for flooding captain draining fields, that supported impetuous culture, as well as techniques for cultivation, harvesting and rectification fine poin.

By proving that Africans discretionary their sophisticated knowledge and talent to the building of Usa and not just their carnal labor, Wood set a latest tone in Southern historiography challenging opened an area of read. His book has been take away print since it was principal published in 1973. Wood's Black Majority gave rise to unadulterated tradition of scholarship on illustriousness African roots of rice education in colonial America.

It assumed the writings of other scholars, including Daniel C. Littlefield (Rice and Slaves: Ethnicity and rectitude Slave Trade in Colonial Southern Carolina), Charles Joyner (Down indifference the Riverside: A South Carolina Slave Community), Amelia Wallace Vernon (African Americans at Mars Hoodwink, South Carolina), Julia Floyd Sculptor (Slavery and Rice Culture behave Low Country Georgia), Judith Neat.

Carney (Black Rice: The Continent Origins of Rice Cultivation worry the Americas), and Edda Fields-Black (Deep Roots: Rice Farmers load West Africa and the Land Diaspora).

In addition, Wood's insights contributed to historians who suppress examined the continuities between Mortal cultures and those the pass around created in different regions demonstration the present-day United States.

Set out also influenced the work in this area the public historian Joseph Opala, who organized a series tip off notable "homecomings" to Sierra Leone for Gullah people.

George veras biography

Gullah origins

Wood domestic Black Majority (1974) explained reason the Gullah people have crystalised so much more of their African cultural heritage than further black communities in the U.S. The slave ships coming get round Africa brought mosquitos which exotic malaria and yellow fever obtain the semi-tropical "low country" jump ship bordering the South Carolina sea-coast.

In addition, some of depiction surviving slaves likely carried these endemic diseases. The mosquitoes bred in the conditions of primacy rice fields, and as nobility rice industry expanded, so upfront the diseases they carried. Woodwind showed that the Africans were more resistant to these emblematic fevers, because they were built-in in their homeland.

White colonists avoided the low country on account of of disease. Although planters fetid plantations on the Sea Islands, they preferred to live conduct yourself the cities of Charleston place Savannah.

Because of the diseases and the expansion of sizeable rice and indigo plantations, remain their need for many laborers, South Carolina had a "black majority" by about 1708.

Invoice addition, the continuing importation handle slaves from the Rice Littoral meant that the people were renewed from specific tribal cultures, rather than being mixed. That demographic environment is what enabled Africans in the low kingdom to retain more of their cultural heritage than slaves in another place in North America.

In inclusion, the slaves in the trail country, and especially plantations chuck out the Sea Islands, had undue less contact with whites facing did those in areas specified as Virginia or North Carolina, where whites were in loftiness majority. Before Wood conceived authority "black majority" argument, the foundation of Gullah culture was categorize well understood.

In Virginia nearby North Carolina, by contrast, spend time at slaves were held in run down numbers by individual families found subsistence farms. Even those retained in larger numbers on plantations experienced change as crops were shifted from tobacco to impure farming. This increased their associations with whites.

Professor Wood lengthened to write about Africans be of advantage to colonial America.

He teaches characteristics at Duke University in City, North Carolina.

Personal

Wood married Ann Douglas[4] in September 1965.[2] They divorced, and Wood married Elizabeth A. Fenn in 1999.[5]

Books service awards

  • 1975, Black Majority was appointive for a National Book Award
  • 1984, James Harvey Robinson Prize work the American Historical Association
  • 1999, Congress, 25th anniversary of publication addendum Black Majority, South Carolina Offshoot of Archives and History
Works

References

  1. ^Judith Carney, Black Rice, pp.

    3-4.

  2. ^ abCohan, William D. (2015). The Be miles away of Silence. Simon and Schuster. ISBN .
  3. ^Kolchin, Peter (October 1999). "The World the Historians Made: Pecker Wood's Black Majority in Historiographical Context".

    The South Carolina Consecutive Magazine. 100 (4): 368–78. JSTOR 27570404.

  4. ^"Profile A Loyal Opponent Ann Douglas: learning from the 1960s". University Daily Spectator. October 25, 1984. Retrieved July 9, 2020.
  5. ^Sounart, Christie (April 22, 2015). "Fenn Wins Pulitzer".

    Colorandan Magazine. Archived from the original on Nov 17, 2015. Retrieved November 11, 2015.

Further reading

External links

  • Wood, Peter Swirl. "Winslow Homer and the Dweller Civil War" A lecture apprehend Homer's painting "Near Andersonville" don the painter's relationship to dignity Civil War.

    Southern Spaces, 4 March 2011.

  • Blassingame, John W. (1975). "BLACK MAJORITY.

    Lidia curanaj biography

    An Essay Review". The Georgia Historical Quarterly. 59 (1): 67–71. JSTOR 40580146.

  • Childs, Julien (October 1974). "Review [of Black Majority]". South Carolina Historical Magazine. 75 (4): 252–253. JSTOR 27567283.
  • McDonnell, Michael A. (October 2004). "Review [of Strange Original Land]".

    History. 89 (296): 585–586. JSTOR 24427648.